Who doesn’t want more for
less? Certainly in marketing, we’d all want more leads for less investment. But
that assumes the leads are of equally high quality, right? Does anyone want to
spend less money to get more poor quality leads? Let’s assume that answer is: “Don’t
be ridiculous.”
Lead cost is serious
business. As often cited, it takes $275 to $325 for a contractor to earn a
customer. So how do you balance holding down costs while bringing in quality?
Consider these steps:
Measure. What gets measured gets done. You cannot manage cost and quality
of leads without some accurate numbers. If you want to determine a lead’s cost,
you have to measure where the leads come from. This means tracking paid search
leads or online leads, as well as pursuing more hands-on research: asking
callers where they heard about the company or the offer they’re calling about.
Divide the cost of the
marketing investment by the number of leads generated, and you get a basic cost
for each lead. (“Basic” because you can’t always account for how much your TOMA
advertising, non-credited referrals and other promotion have kept your name in
the market at the time the customer responded to your marketing.)
Define success. Put meaning behind those numbers. What is a high quality lead
worth to you? No two organizations answer this the same way, especially in
contracting. It’s imprecise to separate the specific value of a lead from the
possible lifetime value of a customer. You could say, for instance, that a lead
for a new system is worth more than a lead for a tune-up. Yet we also recognize
that over a customer’s lifetime, tune-ups can lead to installations and installations
can lead to tune-ups. Additionally, one of the first steps for evaluating the
quality of a lead is to distinguish between raw inquiries (which include every
contact generated by marketing) and accepted leads, which is the group within
that group that is actionable.
Determine the best value.
Obviously, the goal is not getting a lead – the goal is getting a
sale, which can involve an entire process. Therefore, you need to understand
which leads are truly sales-ready, which require significant additional
marketing effort, lead nurturing and sales support and which don’t close at
all.
In particular, it’s good
to identify marketing leads versus sales leads. These have different
characteristics. Marketing leads may need to be nurtured and cultivated
depending on where they are in the buying cycle. They’re leads that need more
information and more time. Sales leads,
on the other hand, are further along in the buying cycle and decision-making
process, and they’re ready for the sales team.
While it can be difficult
to predict exactly how a lead will turn out, hindsight is 20/20. Look at your
past leads to help understand which lead tactics, channels and media are truly
valuable and which, even if they are cheap up-front, cost more and deliver less
in the long run.
Target effectively. Sharpen your aim. Once you understand the market you’re targeting,
build campaigns around those segments – using a mix of offline and online
strategies. Remember, it all works together. For example, a Yesmail study found
that Facebook campaigns had a 50% lift when supported by email, and a 100% lift
when supported by multiple email campaigns. Likewise, Twitter campaigns had a
20% lift when supported by email, and a 40% lift when supported by multiple
email campaigns. As a retail
example, another study showed that online marketing results in 18% lift for
in-store purchases.
If you need help figuring out the best way to generate more leads for less money, contact a Hudson, Ink Marketing Coach today at coaches@hudsonink.com.